HomeNewsAboutCommunitiesSearchSchoolsInteractGatewayHelp

Development of the Curriculum Statement

Health and Physical Education Online Health and Physical Education Online Homepage
 

For Whose Benefit? The Politics of Developing A Health Education Curriculum
Gillian Tasker
Christchurch College of Education

This article is published with permission. It was originally published in Delta: Policy and Practice in Education, 48 (2), 49 (1), 187-202. Delta: Policy and Practice in Education is published by the Department of Policy Studies in Education, Massey University, Palmerston North, New Zealand.

This article should not be read as Ministry of Education policy and should be considered as part of the developmental process. In some instances academic articles may include statements that are not in line with Ministry of Education recommendations.

Abstract: The current wave of curriculum reform in New Zealand has resulted in the completion of a contract to develop the national Draft Health and Physical Education Curriculum Statement (1996). This paper describes curriculum development processes, key contemporary concepts underlying health education, issues in learning and teaching health education, equity issues which have implications for such a curriculum and aspects of a post-modern approach to health education, all of which have informed this development process. A critical challenge for the developers of this curriculum was to establish, and incorporate, the contemporary dimensions of health education in the Draft Health and Physical Education Curriculum Statement which would enhance the health of all students as opposed to some. In the current context of education marketisation, the primary challenge for health educators will be the retention of these dimensions.

Introduction
Directions for a new health education curriculum: Concepts of health education
Developing a new health education curriculum
Theoretical considerations
Learning and teaching in health education
Equity concerns in relation to health education
Issues for implementation
Conclusion
References


Back to top