Case Studies – RWMP
HPP and PPP Clusters, Rotorua and Tauranga
Untitled Document
| This is an account from one of the schools, or clusters of schools, that
have received funding from the Reading, Writing and Mathematics Proposals
Pool (RWMP) to support programmes in reading, writing and mathematics for students
years 1 to 6. |
The HPP and PPP clusters in Rotorua and Tauranga
is the name given to a project aimed at improving the literacy
progress of low-progress students.
This ambitious and extensive project, directed
by Kathryn Atvars, began in 1999 with eight schools led by
Ngongotaha Primary in Rotorua. A further five schools, led
by Te Akau ki Papamoa in Tauranga, joined the project in 2000,
and another 20 in 2001. Over the three years 1999–2001,
approximately 1700 students have been tutored within the programmes,
and over 650 parent tutors have been trained.
The issues
The schools shared a common concern about literacy progress
among two groups of students: those in years 1–4 with reading
ages below 7 years who were making slow progress, and older
students with reading ages from 7 years up who lacked strategies
for gaining greater levels of competence. The schools sought
ways to provide a direct boost to these groups so that the students
met success, increased their enjoyment of reading, developed
a richer range of oral language, and gained the confidence to
move forward with their peers.
The programmes
HPP – Hei Awhiawhi Tamariki ki
te Panui Pukapuka
For the first group of students, the programme Hei Awhiawhi
Tamariki ki te Panui Pukapuka (HPP) (Embracing children within
a storybook reading context) was chosen. In the HPP programme,
students hear a wide variety of storybooks selected to provide
the context of connected, interesting narrative for promoting
oral language development and phonological awareness. Parent
reading tutors use the "one hand" strategy –
providing four elements of information or language before
asking a question – to help students probe the text
and expand their ideas in responses. Oral language is integral
to the reading, with lots of talking, exploration of sounds
and word structures, and fun with rhyming and other activities.
New elements include a reading folder, where
students can see a record of their reading behaviour and learn
to set measurable, attainable goals for themselves.
PPP – Pause Prompt Praise
For older low-progress readers, the tutoring procedure of
Pause Prompt Praise (PPP) was employed. These students receive
more opportunities to self correct errors, and to practise
problem-solving strategies. Parent tutors are therefore trained
to learn a set of specific tutoring skills.
To bring these programmes to life, and to develop
strong relationships with the community and homes, the project
was designed to extend the expertise of both teachers and
parents. Each school allocated a liaison teacher to the project,
with larger schools (over 300) usually involving a senior
teacher as well. The liaison teacher set up the infrastructure
within the school and was responsible for supporting the tutors,
giving them feedback, assessing the students, ensuring that
students' progress was monitored, and maintaining contacts
with parents. Schools were grouped into clusters of four or
five, and each cluster appointed a teacher coordinator. Her
task was to work with each liaison teacher and support the
training of volunteer parent tutors who were willing to train
and work on a one-to-one basis with students using the selected
programmes.
The actions
Professional development
Liaison teachers and coordinators began the project with a
full week's residential course. As well as becoming competent
with the procedures and their specific roles, they developed
a strong sense of collegiality and purpose. Three further
days' professional development were built in to the plan.
Adult volunteer tutors
In each school cluster, the coordinators and liaison teachers
brought together their adult volunteers to train them as tutors.
These carefully structured training days were supported by
handbooks so that tutors were able to take material home.
Coordinators maintained their follow-up with each school,
and liaison teachers sat with tutors to support and guide
them. Parent tutors of PPP supplied tapes of their tutoring
sessions. Feedback by coordinators and liaison teachers to
these volunteers was genuinely helpful. Parent tutors using
HPP are encouraged to peer review, and give each other feedback.
Each parent tutor was assigned three children, and worked with them three times a week for ten weeks.
The results
Student achievement
The project has been extremely successful in improving literacy.
Students in the HPP programmes improved their placing on the
Ready to Read "colour wheel" by an average of just
under three levels in the first ten weeks, with marked improvements
in accuracy and oral language as well. It is of special significance
that Māori students made even greater gains than Pākehā
students, showing that this is indeed a positive and accelerative
programme for them.
HPP results
|
Programme length
(weeks)
|
Pre-reading level
(Ready to Read levels)
|
Post reading level in 2001
(Ready to Read levels)
|
Improvement
(Ready to Read levels)
|
Percentage improvement
(%)
|
|
30
|
4.04
|
11.23
|
7.19
|
177.9
|
|
20
|
5.95
|
11.07
|
5.12
|
86.1
|
|
10
|
5.68
|
8.62
|
2.94
|
51.7
|
All the students who received tutoring through
the PPP procedures made progress of at least one year in reading
age, with over 40 percent gaining two years or more. These
gains kept growing when students stayed in the programmes,
and those who had reached beyond their chronological age did
not regress when tutoring was discontinued. And over 80 percent
of the students enjoyed the tutoring "heaps"!
PPP results
|
Programme length
(weeks)
|
Average reading age, pre-
(years)
|
Average reading age, post
(years)
|
Improvement
(years)
|
|
30
|
8.17
|
11.26
|
3.09
|
|
20
|
8.35
|
10.75
|
2.40
|
|
10
|
8.28
|
9.64
|
1.36
|
Tutors' satisfaction
Over 80 percent of the tutors in both programmes understood
the procedures well, found the experience enjoyable and relevant,
and were eager to continue tutoring. They appreciated opportunities
to revisit and extend their training. Some chose to apply for
training as teachers or teacher-aides.
Principals' satisfaction
Over 80 percent thought the programmes were effective, and
were positive experiences for the students. They recognised
that they needed to provide continued professional development
and feedback so that success continued to build.
Teachers' satisfaction
Improved skills and self-confidence from both programmes impacted
on student's attitudes and behaviour. The liaison teachers
were very significant in helping tutors maintain and grow
their skills, and in bringing classroom teachers into the
loop.
Parental satisfaction
Almost 90 percent of the parents perceived their children
as having benefited greatly, or "quite a bit". Over
half the parents were interested in learning about the procedures
so that they could help their children at home.
Impact on the school and community
The most exciting feature of this adult volunteer tutor involvement
has been the increased capacity for schools and the community
to develop significant and genuine partnerships. Over the
three years, the project has fostered a remarkable climate
of collegial support among schools and parents. It has shown
that families of all ethnic groups, and in low-decile areas,
can find new pathways for themselves if they feel valued and
recognised. Tutors have been delighted at the increase in
their own literacy and general knowledge, especially through
the use of School Journals, which provide the core reading
material for the PPP programme. Many explore the Journal CD-ROM
to find material that matches students' interests. Teachers
have gained respect for parents' tutoring skills, and the
tutors appreciate more of the challenges faced by teachers.
Some of the comments from the adult tutors highlight
the value of the partnerships. Some said they had become more
relaxed – the feeling of dread about being summoned
to the school had gone – and they had become aware of
how to help children enjoy word-play, rhyming, and other verbal
skills. They were developing their own vocabulary, range of
expression and confidence.
"Praise" statements had become part
of parental behaviour. Tutors also developed new friendships
as they met and worked with other parents and with teachers.
The project has engendered community awareness
and support, and has supported schools in the evolution of
the aspects of education that look beyond the immediate goal
of literacy progress to the wider vision of interacting with
whānau, parents, and the community to promote the best
possible relationships among all involved with these literacy
endeavours.
Schools involved
| Cluster 1 |
Cluster 2 |
Cluster 3 |
| Ngongotaha |
Te Akau ki Papamoa |
Owhata |
| Selwyn |
Greerton Village |
St Mary's |
| Kawaha Point |
Greenpark |
Glenholme |
| Mamaku |
Kutarere |
Horohoro |
| St Michaels |
Waimana |
Westbrook |
| Aorangi |
|
Whangamarino |
| Western Heights |
|
Edgecumbe |
| Merivale |
|
Awakeri |
| |
|
Putauaki |
| |
|
Kawerau South |
| |
|
Otakiri |
| |
|
Omaio |
| |
|
Te Whanau-a-Apanui |
| |
|
Raukokore |
| |
|
Arataki |
| |
|
Mt Maunganui |
| |
|
Papamoa |
| |
|
Maketu |
| |
|
Gate Pa |
| |
|
Welcome Bay |
Contact person
Kathryn Atvars
112 Haukore St
Hairini
TAURANGA
Ph 07 5440 119
Fax 07 5440 692
October 2001
Case studies index | top
Ashbrook School, Opokiti |
Cargill Open Plan School, Tokoroa |
Coley Street School, Foxton |
Edendale School, Sandringham, Auckland |
Foxton Primary School |
HPP and PPP Clusters, Rotorua and Tauranga |
ICAN Cluster, Porirua |
Kaipara Literacy Initiative |
Linden School, Wellington |
Linwood Avenue School, Christchurch |
Rawene School, Hokianga |
Rosebank School, Avondale |
Rotorua Primary School |
St Pius X School, Hamilton |
Supporting At-Risk Readers (SARR) |
Taita Central School, Lower Hutt |
TATA |
Te Papapa School, Onehunga |
The Urewera Early Literacy Initiative (TUELI) |
Waipa School
|