|
|
Resource Teachers: Literacy
Professional standards
Management overview | RT:Lit professional standards |
Professional knowledge | Professional development |
Te reo me ona tikanga | Teaching strategies |
Teacher support and guidance | Relationships and communication |
Management of systems and processes
Management overview
| The RT: Lit |
Who |
When |
|
|
- the Ministry of Education through the host school
|
|
| |
- the host school principal
- the management committee of the cluster schools
- the Ministry of Education (directly)
|
- as agreed at each management meeting
- annually in December
|
- has their role defined by
|
- the Memorandum of Agreement between the board of trustees of the host school and the Ministry of Education
- the generic job description
|
- when accessing and establishing the RT:Lit resource
|
- has their ongoing performance described by
|
- the professional standards and the Ministry of Education guidelines for the position
- the performance agreement between the board of trustees of the host school (in consultation with the management committee)
|
- first agreed when employed and then ongoing
|
- has their performance appraised and their professional development needs agreed by
|
- the host principal in consultation with the management committee
|
|

RT:Lit professional standards
Resource Teachers: Literacy are skilled and experienced teachers who work to meet the needs of year 0-8 students who are at risk of low achievement due to difficulties in literacy learning. RT:Lits provide advice and guidance to teachers and schools and one-to-one tuition to students. They must consult and maintain effective relationships with schools, families, referral agencies, and the communities within which they work.
RT:Lits require full teacher registration, primary school teaching experience, demonstrated ability in teaching literacy, and knowledge and understanding of the New Zealand education system and curriculum framework. From 2004, RT:Lits will also be required to hold (or be studying towards) a postgraduate or graduate Diploma of Education (Literacy) or its equivalent. (Equivalent qualifications will be determined by the Ministry of Education as required.)
RT:Lits are based at a host school and are employed by the board of trustees of that school. They work in an itinerant role, as described in the Memorandum of Agreement, among a designated cluster of schools.
Professional standards for RT:Lits were developed by a representative working party and are based on a range of professional standards agreed for teachers. They describe the standards expected in the role of RT:Lit and are intended for use as a basis for performance assessment and for setting objectives for professional development.
Each year, the host principal and the RT:Lit will identify performance indicators from within each of the professional standards to form the basis of their annual performance agreement. The performance indicators described below are examples and are intended to provide options for consideration. It is likely that a minimum of one and a maximum of five of the performance indicators provided would be used. Alternatively, a performance indicator not listed may be more appropriate.
In many cases, the performance indicators would also need to be more specific to the programme, the cluster schools, and/or the experience level of the RT:Lit.

Dimension – Professional knowledge
| Professional standards |
Examples of performance indicators |
Demonstrates depth and knowledge of:
- theories of literacy acquisition and of literacy processes
- current research in the field of literacy
- learning theories and assessment practices and their application to children
- effective teaching strategies and appropriate resources for literacy
- English in the New Zealand Curriculum and its application across the curriculum
- issues and national initiatives in literacy education, including those concerning Māori
and Pasifika students and students from a range of linguistic and cultural backgrounds.
|
Shows evidence of:
- completing (or studying towards) a postgraduate or graduate Diploma in
Education (Literacy) or its equivalent
- presenting current research at appropriate forums
- attending conferences in literacy learning
- providing effective programmes to meet the needs of individual children
- implementing approaches or programmes based on current research material
- accessing English Online
- regularly consulting with advisers and literacy personnel
- being a member of relevant literacy organisations
- examining issues for Māori and Pasifika children in cluster schools
- consulting with relevant professionals concerning the needs of NESB and special needs children
- applying current theory and practice in Māori and Pasifika education
- participating in staff professional development that promotes consideration
of emerging educational thinking and practices
- using IT to support literacy teaching.
|

Dimension – Professional development
| Professional standards |
Examples of performance indicators |
Demonstrates depth and knowledge of:
- ongoing development of their own knowledge and skills in literacy education
- encouraging and assisting colleagues in professional development for literacy education
- seeking support from other colleagues and reflecting on feedback
- ongoing action research processes to enhance practice
- evaluating, appraising, and reflecting on their own and others' teaching practices.
|
Shows evidence of:
- reading relevant Ministry documents and websites
- reading current research articles
- accessing relevant websites and professional journals
- leading discussions on current research or new resources
- providing advice and guidance on literacy learning to schools, teachers, and colleagues
- participating in support groups and/or peer review processes
- undertaking professional development on a regional or national basis
- being involved in a research project
- committing to ongoing tertiary or other work-related studies
- identifying personal development needs and taking appropriate action
- maintaining a professional reflective journal
- taking a lead in professional development within a cluster.
|

Dimension – Te reo me ona tikanga
| Professional standards |
Examples of performance indicators |
Demonstrates depth and knowledge of:
- biculturalism
- adoption of Māori protocols where appropriate
- development of expertise that is culturally appropriate in meeting the literacy needs of Māori students in mainstream settings
- development of further understanding of the Treaty of Waitangi and tikanga Māori.
|
Shows evidence of:
- knowing and using appropriate bicultural teaching resources
- participating in Māori cultural settings
- pronouncing and using Māori names and words correctly
- using and promoting appropriate Māori protocols
- promoting Māori-preferred learning styles for literacy learners, e.g., implementing programmes to foster oracy
- working with RT:M and RT:LB Māori to support literacy learning for Māori students
- using interventions and strategies that reflect an awareness of the Treaty of Waitangi
- participating in activities or courses that enhance understanding of Treaty issues.
|

Dimension – Teaching strategies
| Professional standards |
Examples of performance indicators |
As a teacher of year 0-8 students who are at risk of low achievement due to difficulties in literacy learning, demonstrates expertise and refined strategies in:
- developing and practising specialised literacy teaching programmes and resources, learning activities, and assessment and evaluation
- evaluating and improving their teaching practices
- assessing students requiring support in literacy
- developing literacy programmes.
|
Shows evidence of:
- providing assessment information, specialised programme details, progress reports, and final evaluations of teaching effectiveness
- undertaking peer appraisal of teaching techniques, followed by appropriate outcomes and reflection
- implementing appropriate assessment and sharing reports with teachers and other relevant professionals
- designing, implementing, and evaluating programmes to meet the literacy needs of individual children.
|

Dimension – Teacher support and guidance
| Professional standards |
Examples of performance indicators |
As a resource for teachers of year 0-8 students who are at risk of low achievement in literacy learning, demonstrates expertise and refined strategies in:
- supporting and advising teachers to meet the needs of these students, including
those from various cultures and backgrounds
- identifying and facilitating change in the systemic influences on students' literacy learning
- helping teachers to create an environment where students take responsibility for their own literacy learning
- initiating and participating in the development of strategies and techniques for literacy.
|
Shows evidence of:
- facilitating staff development workshops and meetings
- providing in-service training for teaching support staff
that incorporates appropriate cultural content, e.g., Literacy
Leadership and the Enhancement Programme
- collecting data to support classroom practice
and informing other providers of specialist help
- providing constructive advice and evaluative feedback to teachers
- being involved in the processes that lead to informed changes in school literacy practices.
|

Dimension – Relationships and communication
| Professional standards |
Examples of performance indicators |
Demonstrates skills and success in:
- interpersonal communication that enables effective teacher support
- consultation, facilitation, and collaboration with relevant professionals
- support of students' families (an all-inclusive term that
includes parents, caregivers, and whānau) in collaboration with
school staff, to ensure that they have opportunities to be
involved in their children's literacy learning
- management of professional relationships.
|
Shows evidence of:
- developing and maintaining constructive working relationships
- providing constructive feedback on literacy learning to teachers and principals
- using effective oral and written communication skills
- undertaking effective consultation as required
- consulting and facilitating appropriate interactions
with cluster schools' teachers and other relevant professionals
- working in a collaborative and consultative manner
- using and promoting models of partnership when working
with parents, whānau, and professionals
- understanding the roles and responsibilities of associated professionals.
|

Dimension – Management of systems and processes
| Professional standards |
Examples of performance indicators |
Demonstrates:
- a working understanding of cluster schools' administrative systems and processes
- an ability to collaborate in the development, implementation, evaluation, and improvement of RT:Lit administrative systems and processes.
|
Shows evidence of:
- knowing how each school works in relation to literacy education
- being aware of the management processes and structures of cluster
schools and working within them appropriately
- having a team approach to the development of effective systems and processes
- consulting with appropriate groups and individuals
- following cluster referral processes and meeting timelines
- convening scheduled meetings that follow the collaborative process
- adhering to privacy and confidentiality requirements
- providing regular updates, reviews, and reports to appropriate parties
- effectively co-ordinating services and agencies
- developing and managing budgets and associated financial processes
- collecting, analysing, and using data as the foundation for interventions
- providing ongoing monitoring and support
- applying learned concepts and theories to issues or problems appropriately
- using a range of investigative techniques to seek relevant information
- participating in policy reviews for literacy centres.
|
Reference
These professional standards for RT:Lits are based on those described in:
- Teacher Performance Management: Primary School Teachers and Primary School Deputy/Assistant Principals: A Resource for Boards of Trustees, Principals and Teachers. School Labour Market Policy Unit, Ministry of Education, November 1998;
- "Schedule of Professional Standards for Teachers" in the Primary Teachers, Deputy Principals, Principals and Other Unit Holders Collective Agreement 2001-03
See also Guidelines for the Appraisal of Resource Teachers of Reading, developed by the Ministry of Education and the New Zealand Resource Teachers of Reading (RTR) Association, August 1998; and Resource Teachers: Literacy Guidelines for Teachers and Management Committees, Ministry of Education, 2000.

|
|
|