Teacher’s notes
Investigating heat transfer by conduction
Rationale
While investigating heat transfer by conduction, students will make
decisions about appropriate approaches and methods for gathering specific
information.
Activity
Curriculum level 3-4
Physical world Topic
Heat transfer
Types of investigation
Fair testing, Identifying and classifying, Researching
What you need
- A range of materials that represent heat conductors and heat insulators,
for example, metals, glass, ceramics, wood, cardboard, and plastics.
Each sample needs to be flat, about 50 × 50 cm2,
and about the same thickness.
- Thermometers (alcohol not mercury).
- Measuring cups (250 ml).
- A hot-water bottle.
- A ‘tin’ mug, a ceramic mug, and an insulated (tramping)
mug.
Note: Supporting activity resources are provided
below.
Focus
- Can you think of situations when you might want to stop heat from
escaping from somewhere?
- Are there times when you want something to heat up or cool down quickly?
- What are some different ways that we could investigate heating and
cooling things?
- What do scientists need to consider when deciding how best to investigate
something?
- Why do you think scientists use different methods to study the different
parts of a big investigation?
Exploration
- In groups, give students access to a range of the conducting and
insulating materials.
- Discuss with them whether each material is likely to let heat through
quickly or slowly, and have them share their ideas about why this might
be.
- Tell them they will be grouping the materials into those that let
heat through quickly (conductors), and those that let heat through slowly
(insulators).
- Ask each group to draw a table with two columns: hypothesis and observation.
In the hypothesis column have them rank the materials from those that
they think will let heat through quickly to those that they think will
let heat through slowly.
- Give each group a hot-water bottle full of very hot (but not scalding)
water.
- Ask students to take two materials at a time and hold them against
the hot-water bottle.
- Have them note which material is the better conductor (that is to
say, heats up first).
- Have them use this information to rank the materials in the ‘observation’
column.
- Have the groups compare their ‘observation’ rankings and
discuss why their rankings differ.
- Have each group devise another method they could use that might provide
a more accurate ranking.
- Have the groups share their new methods.
Extension
This activity can be repeated with a focus on solving a problem, for
example, ‘if you were making a mug, which material would be best?’
- What does ‘best’ mean in this context?
- Show students the equipment available: mugs made of different materials,
measuring cup, and thermometer.
- In groups, design a ‘fair test’ or ‘classifying’
type of investigation to determine which material is ‘best’
for making a mug.
- Ask students to carry out their investigations and report back their
findings to the class.
Reflection
- Did all groups have the same order of conductors using the first
method? Why/why not?
- How many different methods did the class suggest for improving the
investigation? What were they? Were any very different to the others?
- What might be some benefits of investigating the same question in
a lot of different ways?
- Why do you think scientists sometimes investigate the same issue using
a range of different approaches and methods?
- How did you decide which methods were the most useful? What criteria
do you think scientists might use to make the same decision?
Activity resources
- Ministry of Education. (2003). Heat on the move: Transferring
heat through temperature differences. Building Science Concepts,
Book 36. Wellington: Learning Media.