Teacher’s notes
Conflicting theories for the origin of the Moon
Rationale
There are different views on the origin of the Moon. Investigation
results can be interpreted in different ways which are sometimes conflicting.
Critical thinking and matching evidence with theories are skills that
need to be taught and practised by students.
Activity
Curriculum level 5-6
Planet Earth and beyond Topic
Space
Type of investigation
Researching
What you need
- Copies of the information on four theories of the Moon’s formation,
and 14 pieces of evidence that support or refute those theories.
Note: Supporting activity resources are provided
below.
Focus
- Why do scientists think that the solar system has not always been
as it is today?
- What are the past and current views of how the solar system was formed?
- Why is it unusual that Earth is the only terrestrial planet that has
a Moon?
- What sort of information could help scientists explain when and how
the Moon was formed?
- What technologies do scientists use to make careful observations about
space objects such as the Moon?
- Why do you think scientists might continue to debate different theories
about how the Moon formed?
Exploration
- As a class, discuss each theory of the Moon’s formation.
- In groups, assign a theory to each group.
- Get each group to choose the pieces of evidence that support or refute
that theory. (This may require further research.)
- Have each group present their findings to the class, giving reasons
for their decisions about whether each piece of evidence (or combinations
of evidence):
- supports their theory
- refutes their theory
- has an uncertain/irrelevant relationship to the theory.
- After all groups have presented their findings, discuss with the class
the pieces of evidence that seem to support two or more theories.
- Get the students to decide which is most likely to be the leading
theory for the formation of Earth’s Moon and why.
Extension
As research practice, students could investigate and report on the origin
of each of the four theories, for example:
- Who was/were the main proponent(s)?
- When (approximately) was the theory first put forward? How long was
it held for?
- When, what and how was new evidence (if any) discovered to counter
or undermine that theory?
- What new evidence might counter or undermine the present leading theory?
Reflection
- Why can’t scientists tell how the Moon formed just by making
careful observations?
- Why have scientists changed their minds in recent years about the
most likely theory of the origin of the Moon?
- How did you go about sorting out, and making sense of, this massive
amount of often conflicting or ambiguous evidence?
- Why is it important to consider alternative theories when analysing
a new piece of evidence?
- Which theory of the origin of the Moon is currently the one that the
majority of scientists favour? Why?