Teacher’s notes
Plate tectonics (1/2): birth of a theory
Rationale
In this activity students look at how plate tectonic theory developed
and why it was not accepted when it was first introduced.
Activity
Curriculum level 5-6
Planet Earth and beyond Topic
Earth science
Type of investigation
Researching
Note: This activity may be used as a context for science Achievement Standard 1.2. (AS 90187: Process information to describe a use of science knowledge with direction.)
Activity sequence
This activity is the first in a sequence of two activities. The second activity is Plate tectonics (2/2): evolution of a theory.
What you need
- A historical overview of the work of Wegener.
- Five cartoon pictures of identified characters/scenes.
Note: Supporting activity resources are provided
below.
Focus
- Has the surface of the Earth always looked as it does today? What
evidence is there to support the idea that the appearance of the Earth
has changed over time?
- What other views are there for how the surface of the Earth has changed?
- What evidence is there against plate tectonics?
- We take plate tectonics for granted today. Why was it so controversial
when it was introduced?
Exploration
- Give students a copy of the information about Wegener (and/or encourage
them to undertake their own research).
- In groups, give each group a copy of the cartoon pictures.
- Get them to use the information provided, and their own investigations,
to create appropriate speech bubbles for what the cartoon people might
be saying, which reflect their attitudes to the scientific approach
and/or methodology of their time.
- Additionally, they could develop, and present to the class:
- a role-play or drama depicting Wegener’s role in the development
of plate tectonic theory; or
- an investigation into another scientific theory that has developed
over time through diverse methods and approaches.
Extension
- What evidence is there to support plate tectonics?
- What movements can occur at plate boundaries? What effect do these
movements have?
Reflection
- Why was the shape of the coastlines of Africa and South America not
enough to show the continents had been joined?
- What is the significance of the rock and fossil evidence?
- Why would only one investigation have been insufficient to support
plate tectonics?
- Why is the theory of plate tectonics so acceptable today?
- Which evidence supporting plate tectonics that has been around for
a long time, is now looked at in a different light based on new discoveries?
(For example, the shape of the continents is old evidence; discoveries
about Earth’s magnetic field are new.)
- How have advances in technology clinched Wegener’s theory?
- What effect do plate movements have on the environment? Is this a
rapid change or a slow change?
PDF help