|
Task
|
Judgement for Credit
|
Judgement for Merit
|
Judgement for Excellence
|
|
Task 1
|
NB Parts (a), (b) and (c) not assessed.
|
NB Parts (a), (b) and (c) not assessed.
|
NB Parts (a), (b) and (c) not assessed.
|
|
(d)
|
- Must outline at least 3 key actions clearly
- Actions must be logically linked to the goal in Task 1(b).
|
- Must outline at least 3 key actions clearly
- Actions must
be logically linked to the goal in Task 1(b) and
form a detailed, co-ordinated plan.
|
- Must outline at least 3 key actions clearly
- Actions must
be logically linked to the goal in Task 1(b) and
form a detailed, co-ordinated plan.
|
Task 2
(a)
|
Analysis must show the steps taken to put the plan together and at
least ONE motive behind the planning.
|
Analysis must show the steps taken to put the plan together and at
least ONE motive behind the planning.
|
Analysis must show the steps taken to put the plan together and at
least ONE motive behind the planning.
|
|
(b)
|
Identifies at least TWO likely and different consequences for each
of people and country. Consequences may be positive, negative, short term,
long term, economic, social, political, cultural, etc.
|
Identifies at least TWO likely and different consequences for each
of people and country. Consequences may be positive, negative, short term,
long term, economic, social, political, cultural, etc.
|
Identifies at least TWO likely and different consequences for each
of people and country. Consequences may be positive, negative, short term,
long term, economic, social, political, cultural, etc.
|
|
(c)
|
|
|
In depth analysis must include at least ONE of the following:
- the future complexity of the issue is clearly shown by the
relationship between the plan and the likely consequences
- Social Studies concepts used correctly throughout (especially those covered
during "Kiwi Kollaboration" unit or see p.14 SSCNZ).
- reasoned arguments for planning process and motives.
- accurate and detailed supporting
evidence for arguments.
|
