|
Evidence
|
Judgements for
Achievement
|
Judgement for
Merit
|
Judgement for
Excellence
|
|
Task 1
|
Identify three people/groups and whether they are for or against the resort development.
|
| |
|
Task 2
|
Explain why two people/groups hold differing values positions about the resort development.
|
Explain in detail why three people/groups
hold differing values positions about the resort development.
Some reference to the resources.
|
Explain in depth why three people/groups hold differing
values positions about the resort development. Specific reference to the
resources in all three cases.
|
|
Task 3
|
Describes some (2) consequences of people holding differing values positions - e.g. short term and long term or positive and negative.
|
Describes a range (3/4) of consequences of people holding differing values positions - e.g. short term and long term or positive and negative.
|
Describes in depth a range (4/5) of consequences of people holding differing values positions - e.g. short term and long term or positive and negative.
|
|
Task 4
|
Describes and attempts to justify the significance of at least two consequences of the resort development for the environment of Antarctica.
|
Describes and justifies the significance of two consequences of the resort development for the environment of Antarctica.
|
Describes and justifies the significance of three consequences of the resort development for the environment of Antarctica.
|
