|
|
Judgements for
Achievement
|
Judgement for
Merit
|
Judgement for
Excellence
|
|
Task 1
|
Stated 2 possible social actions in relation to tourism in
Antarctica identified the likely consequences of each for people and
places/environment
|
Stated 3 possible social actions in relation to tourism in
Antarctica identified the likely consequences of each for people and
places/environment
|
Stated 4 possible social actions in relation to tourism in
Antarctica identified the likely consequences of each for people and
places/environment. Relevant social ideas and terms are used.
|
|
Task 2
|
Identify, in the form of a talkback host's decision, the preferred
action(s).
|
Identify, in the form of a talkback
host's decision, the preferred action(s) and justify with reasoned argument.
|
Identify, in the form of a talkback
host's decision, the preferred action(s) and justify with
reasoned argument. The reasons (social, political, economic etc) are
linked logically and supported with evidence
|
Task 1 - Evidence may include
- Build a small hotel - will have less impact on environment
- Built eco friendly hotel - tourists responsible for own rubbish. They must
take all rubbish back with them.
- Don't build a hotel - then there will be no damage to the environment.
Task 2 - Evidence may include
The best action is to not build a hotel at Scott Base, because otherwise
there will be massive damage to the Antarctic environment. Even if
people take their own rubbish back home with them, the buildings will be
taking over land that may be important nesting sites for penguins.
People will want to get up close to wildlife to take photos and this
will scare them away and force them to find other places away from humans
to nest, etc.
This material has been produced by UNITEC Institute of Technology
under contract to the Ministry of Education.
|
